12/27/2019

The French Salon (Oslo, Norway)

The French Salon 

Norway National Gallery
Universitetsgata 13, Oslo

Phone:    (+47) 21 98 22 70
Email   
Website

Timetable:

    Mon - Closed
    Tue-Fri:    11am-5pm.
    Thu:   11am-6pm.
    Sat-Sun: 11.30am-4pm.


Located beside the National Gallery's gift shop and inside the building of the National Gallery of Norway, the French Salon is a lovely café that surprises for its intimate elegant ambience and its simple but tasty menu.

The premises are very French neoclassic decorated in green marble and white marble busts inserted in walled niches. The tables are simply but elegantly set and the place is very cozy and comfortable

Sometimes you are hungry and want to eat wherever the closest place is. This was the case for me when visiting The French Salon. We wanted to continue our visit of the gallery and needed a break, so going outside was a bit pointless and a waste of time. Art Galleries cafés are rarely cheap, so I checked the menu and pricing in advance, and to my surprise it was average price in the city, nothing really overpriced or expensive.  

Their menu was small, but the dishes on offer were yummy, Norwegian inspired, generous in size and nicely plated.  They also have a small selection of cakes and slices displayed in the cabinet, which looked fabulous but we didn't try. 

Their coffee was also good, and they have cortado on offer, something I always appreciate when I am overseas

Although I loved this café, there was some issues with the service that would need to be fixed. The main one was that the café was understaffed. The staff were extremely friendly, welcoming and apologetic with some customers who complained about a mishap. Despite the speed and diligence of the waitresses, they couldn't cope with the constant flow of customers, even though they wasn't any group visiting or too many visitors. Two waitresses had to clean the tables, get the orders, usher the people in, serve food, and get the payments. The result was chaos in the service and stressed waitresses.  You cannot enter and sit at will but have to wait to be ushered in and seated, and I had to wait over 5 minutes at the door waiting for that to happen. The cafe needed at least another waiter at the time I visited and perhaps two or three more at rush hour.


Having said this, I really love this place. It has something special that is difficult to explain. The patina of history, perhaps. Pity the chaos in the service. The rest was lovely and I would love to go back. 

12/22/2019

12/19/2019

Validately (online platform, Paid tests)




This is a review of my experience as tester.

They are a legit company and pay $10 USA per test. 

Like many other UX companies, you have to pass an entry test, not paid, to be admitted. Once you are, you fill-in some general info about your demographics and wait for the tests to be thrown at you. 

You are informed of any test by email, not on the site. That is, there is no member area or dashboard for testers on their website where to find the tests.  You just get the link if something matches your demographic. Click on the test link and follow the prompts. To do the test on the desktop you have to use Chrome browser and install their recording extension; on the phone, you have to download their app from Google Play. 

Although they do send tests often, they don't seem to have the volume of tests that other UX companies have, so testers are like hungry zombies at the smell of a healthy human. Once the email arrives, even if it takes you three seconds to open it, the page is already locked and shows a message saying that there are too many testers trying to access the test at the same time, try again. You keep trying, by reloading the page, to not avail. Then, the test is over and you got nothing. Or simply, you get there and, in the unlikely case no one is fighting for the test, you get through the screener and this one rejects you. All of these situations are very frustrating. 


The phone app is really nice and user friendly, definitely the best I've tried from different companies. However, it could be better designed. If, by mistake, you press step two without having finished step one, there is no arrow or way of going back, not even by using your phone back arrow option.That's bad design.

Once you perform the test and it's uploaded onto the cloud, you'll receive an email saying that they've got it, that they'll  review it within seven days and, if accepted, they'll pay you in the following seven days via PayPal.

It takes about 7 days for the test to be reviewed, and if the rating is acceptable they immediately pay you by PayPal, which is really nice.

Unless you fit their preferred demographics, you won't earn much there. That's at least my experience. So there are greener pastures out there; this is a sort of small shed you keep just in case it rains something, if you know what I mean.

Still, they are reliable and have a good deal of business.

12/17/2019

Survey Junkie (Online platform, Paid surveys)



I joined Survey Junkie after reading some positive comments by some of the people who use the site. My experience after a week there is nothing I would recommend. Or better said, this site did not work for me. 

They, like many others, profile hard core, with your connivance, with the excuse of getting you more and better paid surveys. You need to fill in profiling questions regarding your whole life: personal situation, work, household, health, electronics, etc.

So, how many surveys have I received since I joined? Zero.

I decided to quit, because, what's the point? Surprise surprise, but no surprise, they don't have a 'delete your account' available in the registered user's member area. Why not? You have to contact Customer Service requesting cancellation; they aim to reply in 48 hours and confirm the cancellation. They are quite nice and usually reply before that time.

I don't recommend the site. Not that they are wasting your time or doing anything bad to you. It is that profiling me on the excuse of getting me paid surveys and then providing me with none sounds like odd to me. 

Avoid.

12/09/2019

Biagio's, Niddrie, Melbourne

The place has an amazing vibe, atmosphere and old-European bar-cafe style that attracts patrons like bees to honey. The service is really friendly and accommodating, however, service is extremely slow even when the place is not even half-full and the food was average. I had a burger menu and the burger was burnt, the fries were dreadful and the burger was not really well assembled. I haven't returned since, and the good looks will never satisfy my belly.

12/06/2019

User Testing (Online Platform, Paid Tests)




I've tried many user testing companies and this has been the best for me so far. I've made some bucks on this site, and they have been paid, as promised, within a week of performing the tests. This company is the only one that, at least for my demographic, provides me with tests mostly every day. 

Some major business and companies use this site, and not the others, and I think they are already established and well organised, so one can see how things flow here and not elsewhere, at least for me.
 
HOW TO BECOME A TESTER

Like most user testing companies, you have to perform an entry test, which isn't paid, to see if you qualify. What they ask you to do is similar to what you would be doing as remote website tester. 

Once you are accepted, you will be given access to your member dashboard and see a list of tests offered to you, from which you can choose from. There is a constant stream of tests, and it is up to you if you try any or all of them.  

HOW IT WORKS

The first paid test you do is examined by the UT team. They will give you the initial rating. It takes them between 6 and 9 days to do that, but they do it; not only that, they even comment on your performance, and things needing of improvement in the future. Getting a high rating from them is very important because, the higher your rating is, the more in demand you are, and the more tests you are offered to take part in.  You will be rated for each of your tests, but after the first one, the ratings will come from the companies that paid for them.
 

Like similar sites, customers are companies with specific requirements. They won't tell you what they want directly,  but will screen you to see if you are what they are looking for. They do so by asking you a series of questions with answers to choose from. You need to answer honestly or might find yourself in trouble. If you qualify you can take the test. The screening takes just a few seconds to perform.

Before you enter the test, your task is mentioned. The system gives you 15 minutes to start the test. That's great if you have your kids around, you are cooking and need to put things aside, or have to go to the loo. Also great in case the recording program is misbehaving and you have to reinstall it. You have to allow their desktop app (actually a Chrome extension) to run, that is, to record your micro sound and share your screen. Once you do that, you press enter and the test starts. You have to read the instructions out loud, and verbalise your thoughts on the tasks you are doing, and do that continuously.

In the member area settings you can decide whether you want to receive emails for incoming tests, or just hear the ding when you are logged in. I think the latter is best, because, as I've said, there are plenty of tests coming in at times and you don't want to flood your inbox with emails. To hear the beep, needless to say, you have to have a tab open, logged into your account and the dashboard "Take Tests' open. 


DOWNSIDES
>> The ratings you get from the companies aren't always fair. They might not like your accent, that you took a bit less or more time from what they wanted you to, or simply that you did your job as tester and told them, politely, that their website sucks.  
 >> The extension/program they use on the Chrome desktop is not always reliable. I lost plenty of tests for which had qualified because the recorder was malfunctioning. They always tell you to check this and that, but most testers have already done that when complaining to CS; they are testers after all! When it works, it is great, but when it does not, it makes testers lose money and UT customers get annoying silent recordings and waste their time. Just fix the recording or just provide with an alternative.  
>> You might have problems with your microphone or the app during the session, and if the recording cannot be heard or has poor quality, your test will be rejected and you won't be paid. Or they will give you the lowest rating, which directly damages your prospectives of getting good tests offered to you. I mean, why not allowing the tester to repeat the test for free? 
>> You don't qualify for 90% of the tests coming at you, as they are targeted to specific industries and consumers. They might want a person who is bilingual in Korean. A person who uses a certain airline, bank, supermarket or store. A person who doesn't know anything about a certain product, or a person who has kids, just to mention a few examples. This varies from test to test. You have to take the screener and be honest because, otherwise, you will be in trouble and won't be paid. 

>> I have the strong impression that many of those screeners are archived and added to your profile, so they profile you to the core and quite accurately.  I am never happy with that, especially because you aren't really working for the company, you are working for rewards not for a salary. Yet, they will have so many details about you, besides your voice. If something goes wrong, the site is hacked for example, your whole life info could be used for fraudulent purposes. I am not sure if their security system is really good, either.

>> Some tests have between 12 or 60 steps and, although enjoyable, they are time consuming; you might spend 30 to 60 minutes on a test and still be paid 10 bucks. That is unacceptable. I dont blame the site for allowing that to happen. I also blame those customers from big companies and corporations that run on the cheap when it comes to paying, and expect a tester to go through their demands for alms. Dear UX designer if you test is 50+ steps is because you don't know how to design an US remote usability test, as simple as that.

>>  Unless you live in a country where 10$ USA is a lot of money, that's a very low per-hour fee. At the moment, the duration of the test is not mentioned, so it could take you 10 minutes, which is the best case scenario, or 60+.

>> They mostly work on Chrome, so you can't perform the tests on any other browser unless the test is specific for that browser.

THEIR PHONE APP
>> I installed their phone app from Google Play, but it required me to have my phone on developer settings, which I allowed it to. Then my phone itself started to request me to switch this mode off or the phone being at risk of crashing or being hacked.
>> In addition, the app didn't allow me to log in, rejecting my login email as incorrect, which is totally bananas! 
>> I removed the app and I don't do tests on the phone, which is a pity, because there are tons of phone tests coming in.  
>> There are simple apps out there that capture sound and screen and aren't invasive at all. I actually tested one of them for another company, and it was fantastic. Why not using that instead? 
 
CUSTOMER SERVICE
CS is useless. It takes ages for you to get a reply, and although they reply, eventually, it is first with a Zen desk robotic message that shows that the officer hasn't really read your query and acted on an impulse by reading the subject. When you complain about some of the companies testing requiring a huge amount of time for little money and for not explicitly saying that at the beginning, they blame you for staying in the test; but for some people this income is necessary and they put up with bad behaviour out of desperately needing extra cash. I had CS officers who needed four of my messages being as blunt as it gets for them to actually read my emails and respond to what I was asking not what they wanted to reply to. It is not acceptable that a company that trades in the stock market has such poor service for those who make possible the site, which are the testers. The worst part is that customer service has grown worse at the same pace as the company is growing up and cashing in.

 

Tresor EDT by Lancome

This was the first quality perfume I bought, one for which I have to save, because, in those days, I was poor and Tresor was a very expensive perfume. Although I don't use it regularly nowadays, I always keep small samples and travel size bottles at hand because, the time has passed, the world of perfumes has evolved and changed, but Tresor is still today one of my favourite fragrances.

Lancome has reinvented Tresor in the last years, but the fact remains, the original Tresor, is still a great fragrance that smells of groomed woman, that is feminine and seductive. Tresor is a classic for a reason. In a world that discards perfumes every two years, having a perfume like this still being sold, says something about any perfume. For the younger generations, Tresor smells of their mothers and grand-mothers, so it will have an old-lady sort of attached prejudice; yet, if they didn't see the bottle and smelled the fragrance in a blind testing, many of them would still like or love the scent. 

 
Tresor is the essence of femininity: intoxicating, velvety, powdery, warm and floral. It has an unique distinguishable scent that you won't find matched anywhere else. While I have found that some scents by designer houses smell the same, I mean the same, as other perfumes with different names from another designer house, I have still to find a perfume that smells like Tresor. It has never been and will never be. Amen.


This is one of those perfumes that I don't overdo, because, if I do, I get a headache and I cannot stand it. A tiny amount of spray or rubbing on the usual spots goes the long way and brings up the woman in you even in those days that you feel a bit crappy.