"Any work considered potentially interesting will be referred to other staff, with the city's public art officer and director of community services making the ultimate decision."
I hate my taxes paying for the indiscriminate destruction of private and public property. I hate buses or trains being scratched, painted or destroyed with ugly scrawls and insults, vandalised by young kids who use their spray cans to kill their time or get a thrill by doing something illegal. I hate the front of a household being painted with a scrawl or tag. There are plenty of lanes, back walls, car parks, and abandoned sites where they could do so easily and will save us the expenses of the cleaning up. I do not support or encourage any sort of vandalism.
Plenty of "illegal" tagging, sticks and stencils in our State are -I'd dare to say- quite artistic and philosophical, as they are the way in which their creators show their inner world, wishes, frustrations and/or creative side and connect with us. It is a way of saying, I do exist and my opinion also counts and of the readers to share the same feelings or just reflect on what it is said.
If Councils regulate Art, Art is going to become a sheep within a herd, and nothing truly creative or slightly critical will come out. If Councils invest themselves with the power to decide what Art is or should be, they are killing its very core - Art is challenging, provocative, thoughtful and magical, no matter how beautiful it is. Look at Picasso's work. Not all of it is beautiful, easy to look at, or approachable to the vulgus; still, he was the most remarkable artist of the 20th century. If he was painting his work on the walls today, we would find plenty of people, and I mean plenty, that would think that it needs to be removed because it is non-artistic and ugly. If you are a fan of Picasso, think, for example, about Pollock or Rothko?
I am convinced that anti-graffiti campaigns actually encourage illegal graffiti and tagging, sticking and painting. Councils should be diverting the cleaning money to implement policies that let the youth use their cans in ways and places that suit their needs. I think that would be cheaper than cleaning up. So many millions spent on erasing instead of creating something.
Graffiti is a valid form of expression. It shows the pulse of a city, of a generation, and of a Culture. That is why there are remakable differences between the Street Art and graffiti you see in Granada (Spain), Malaka (Malaysia) or Perth WA, just to mention three very different places.
There is an empty wall close to my place, the lateral wall of a building hosting several businesses. A freaking ugly huge wall that I pass by every day to always tell myself that it needs of something painted on it. Last week, however, the wall was fully covered by a sentence -written in white- expressing a deep sense of social alienation. I guess, it was written by an Aborigine or an Immigrant. Or so I thought. I thought that that was subversive, in a good way, and something that lived up the ugly wall. The graffiti has barely lasted a week, now dormant beneath a layer of ugly brown paint that does not make anything lively.
